Can any lawyer or Solicitor confirm law in regards to cycling on footpaths?

Confirmation required -- is it Wheel diameter or age that determines cycling on footpaths. As I understood it, in my youth, it was cycles with wheels under 14" diameter were legal on the footpath. I ask this question as a mobility scooter user who is limited to 4mph on the footpath and as it is a class 3 vehicle the law requires me to have a rear view mirror, a warning device(ie. a hooter) and a tax disc, yet cyclists have no speed limit and are capable of riding at speeds in the low 20mph or even greater

The primary legislation which makes cycling on a footway an offence is section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act, this provides that a person shall be guilty of an offence if he "shall wilfully ride upon any footpath or causeway by the side of any road made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot-passengers or shall wilfully lead or drive any carriage of any description upon any such footpath or causeway."

Pedal cyclists have a right to use bridleways, restricted byways and byways open to all traffic, but on bridleways they must give way to walkers and riders. Like horse riders, they have no right to use footpaths and if they do so they are committing a trespass against the owner of the land, unless use is by permission As with horse-riding use of any right of way by cyclists can be controlled by traffic regulation orders and byelaws imposed by local authorities. Infringement of byelaws or orders is a criminal offence. Under the Highways Act 1835, it is an offence to ride a bicycle on the pavement at the side of a road, and under the Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999 a person who rides on a pavement can be fined on the spot by a police officer.

This is punishable by a fixed penalty notice of 拢30 under Section 51 and Schedule 3 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988.

This prohibition does not extend to country footpaths where no road. Similarly it does not apply to anyone under 16, who in practice tend to be riders of children's bikes.

Section 85 of the Local Government Act 1888 extended the definition of "carriage" to include "bicycles, tricycles, velocipedes and other similar machines."

The object of Section 72 Highways Act 1835 was intended not to protect all footpaths, but only footpaths or causeways by the side of a road, and that this is still the case has been ruled in the high court. The legislation makes no exceptions for small wheeled or children's cycles, so even a child riding on a footway is breaking the law. However, if they are under the age of criminal responsibility they cannot, of course, face prosecution.

On 1st August 1999, new legislation came into force to allow a fixed penalty notice to be served on anyone who is guilty of cycling on a footway. However the Home Office issued guidance on how the new legislation should be applied, indicating that they should only be used where a cyclist is riding in a manner that may endanger others. At the time Home Office Minister Paul Boateng issued a letter stating that:

"The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required."

check with local clerk of court / they will have all laws for county and state

Neither. Cycling on a footpath is contrary to Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835. In practice, most people ignore little children riding on the footpath, as it's a damned sight safer for them than riding on the road, but it's still illegal.

Some police forces deal with it by way of a fixed penalty notice, otherwise the offender can be summonsed to court.